sheilaz wrote:Morton, I'm with you on this, although I too hear that argument put forward, and think it's a shame.
For me, if everyone offered trust and respect willing in the first instance, the world would be a happier place.
Then, if that trust is abused, it is dented or withdrawn, but I'd rather start from a respectful position.
Given how open-ended some words and concepts are, I'd much prefer to start from what I would term a 'civilized' position, in that every human being should be accorded a modicum of civility.
'Respect' in this case would properly be civility; as for going any deeper than our social veneer we must wear, that is a very private and personal measurement. as so with 'trust'. That word is a loaded term and again a concept that is very personal. Do we 'trust' strangers'? Trust them for what; to do what, exactly? Or should we put it in terms of the everyday marketplace of dealing with total strangers who may or may not be 'unstable'...
I'm very cautious and at times suspicious of people, especially totally strange people; just how 'strange' are they? In this day and age, a 'bit' of paranoia, could be what saves a life...Life Ahead: Proceed With Caution..(actually, I should say: Humans Ahead: Proceed With Extreme Caution.
Indiscretion is really, not the better part of valour...and always be civil!
(what was it that Oscar Wilde said...'Oh, I hate the cheap severity of abstract ethics.'
